Home > Case study examples > Case Study on Barclays Bank

Case Study on Barclays Bank

Case Study on Barclays Bank

Introduction
This case study paper will analyze the economics of Barclays, one of the largest financial providers in the UK and in the world. It will also use Barclay’s example to illustrate the peculiarities of banking industry functioning.

Overview of the Business
Barclays is an international financial services provider operating in more than 50 countries and serving more than 42 million customers worldwide. It engages in commercial banking, investment banking, wealth management and asset management. Its commercial banking arm offers services to British and international customers, including current accounts, savings accounts, mortgages, insurance, credit cards and consumer loans. It has a majority stake in Absa, a major South African bank. It has recently acquired Russia’s Expobank and announced its intention to buy Indonesia’s Akita.

Barclays’ investment banking and investment management business cluster consists of Barclays Capital, Barclays Wealth and Barclays Global Investors. Barclays Capital is an investment bank that also offers consultancy, financing and risk management services. Barclays Wealth provides private banking, asset management, stockbroking, offshore banking, wealth structuring and financial planning services. Barclays Global Investors is one of the world’s largest asset managers and providers of investment management products and services.

Barclays’ net income amounted to £23,000 million in 2007, up from £17,333 two years earlier. Earnings per share constituted 68.9p, and return on equity was 20.3%. However, the results for the first half of 2008 were disappointing, profits being 33% down. While insignificant growth was delivered by Barclays’ commercial banking division, Barclays Capital profits fell 68%, and Barclays Global Investors profits were 32% less than in the second half of 2007.

After the company refused to buy Lehman Brothers and the latter filed for bankruptcy, Barclays acquired Lehman’s core American and Canadian investment banking and capital markets businesses for £940 million (Murchie, 2008).

Hit by the global financial crisis, the company agreed to participate, together with seven other large UK financial institutions, in the £500 billion government Special Liquidity Scheme (Farrell, 2008).

Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
Barclays’ business model will be analyzed using Porter’s Five Forces Model (Porter, 1979).

- Suppliers: Given the nature of the banking industry, Barclays’ suppliers are its customers at the same time. Individuals and companies depositing money with Barclays act as suppliers of liquidity. Supplier concentration is not a serious threat, since Barclays serves over 42 million customers and clients worldwide. There is little threat of forward integration: most Barclays’ customers/suppliers are individuals or small companies. There is no differentiation of inputs: money is the only input. Importance of volume to suppliers is high, since banks offer better deals for larger sums of money deposited. Switching costs are medium to high, since banks use a variety of methods to secure long-term contracts and retain their customers/suppliers.
Conclusion: low to medium suppliers bargaining power

- Buyers: Customers of Barclays are generally dispersed; however, there are certain areas of Barclays’ activities (such as wealth management) where customers are more concentrated and powerful. There is little differential advantage in the industry given the similarity of services banks offers. There is no backward integration threat. Buyer switching costs are medium to high, as outlined above. Banks also attempts to offer their customers integrated financial solutions to discourage switching. At the same time, availability of existing substitute products is high, and buyers are very price-sensitive. Conclusion: low to medium buyer bargaining power

- New Entrants: In the current situation, there is little threat of new entrants, since banking is regarded as a risky business. The trend is towards greater concentration of banking industry rather than diversification. Existence of barriers to entry (such as capital requirements) makes entry more complicated. Brand equity is very important: confidence is the key in banking, so new entrants might find it difficult to develop an initial level of confidence. Access to necessary inputs (liquidity) is also hard to gain for new players.

At the same time, learning curve advantages are relatively unimportant, since innovation is not the most important profit driver in banking. Also, banking does not rely heavily on proprietary technology. Researchers argue that economies of scale are of little importance in financial services industry. However, specialist knowledge might deter new entrants, as major banks know markets and customers much better than new players. There is also scarcity of important resources such as qualified expert staff. Conclusion: medium threat of new entrants

- Threat of Substitution: Given high brand loyalty of customers and close customer relationships, threat of substitution is lower than in other industries. However, higher quality of service and lower price of competitors might encourage customers to switch. Therefore, customer retention relies on Barclays’ remaining price-competitive, offering excellent customer service, and maintaining high switching costs. Conclusion: medium threat of substitution

- Rivalry: Banking sector is becoming increasingly more concentrated; concentration decreases the intensity of rivalry. However, there are factors that enhance the intensity of rivalry in financial services, such as little differentiation between players, similarity of players’ strategies, price competition, and slow market growth. Conclusion: medium to high intensity of rivalry

Future Strategies

No major financial institution in the Anglo-Saxon world has been able to escape the devastating effects of the credit crunch. The performance of Barclays Group in the first half of 2008 was disappointing – it reported a 33% decline in profits. News on massive losses was followed by a share price slump. Barclays’ chief tried to instill optimism in shareholders be stating that ‘we are, and we will be, working as hard as we can to create the conditions that enable a higher price to be placed on our shares over time.’ Earnings per share were down to 27p from 41.4p previous year.

The group, faced with significant writedowns, promised to change its approach to risk management. By looking at Barclays’ performance results, it’s easy to predict a shift among bankers from ambitious investment projects to the traditional business-as-usual model where retail banking is the key. Barclays Capital, the group’s investment banking arm, and Barclays Wealth, its asset management unit, reported 68% and 32% decline in profit, respectively. Commercial banking department enjoyed a lackluster growth. Only Barclaycard, the group’s credit card and consumer loans business, showed a considerable profit increase of 30%. Interest rate products had a record of a five-star performance, while mortgages and other asset-backed securities accounted for most of company’s losses.

The response to the catastrophic dip in profits was to minimize credit market exposure. Subprime lending was reduced by 2.6%, and deals with leveraged financed were cut by 2.4%. The group’s management outlined prime lending and expansion in emerging markets as strategic directions for the future. Thus, Barclays’ latest Investor Presentation (released on the 7th of October) lists business diversification and international expansion as the group’s top priorities. Its non-UK operations grew from delivering 20% of profits in 2003 to 43% in 2007. It boasts 670 new distribution outlets in Western Europe and selected emerging markets. Acquisition of Expobank in Russia and launch of business in Pakistan suggest that the focus on emerging markets is likely to persist. Barclays aspires to become the biggest bank in Sub-Saharan Africa given its success in Botswana, Kenya and Ghana. Revenue growth in UAE and India exceeded 100% in 2006-2007. Absa, Barclays’ fully owned subsidiary, has won the largest share of the retail deposit and advances market in South Africa.

While investment banking and wealth management appear to be risky businesses in the times of crisis, retail and commercial banking will be the income driver. Barclays is the world’s eleventh largest bank by revenue and is determined to grow its share. With regard to UK banking, improving asset quality is the top priority: mortgages with loan-to-value of 60% or less constituted 71% of the balance in December 2007 and 66% in June 2008. Barclays also aims at diversifying loan portfolio to deliver strong credit risk performance.

The group’s investment arm plans to build close relationships with its top-tier clients. It already works with 61% of the world’s100 largest pension funds. Barclays’ wealth management department will cooperate closely with Barclays Global Investor and Barclays Capital to ensure referrals of large lending opportunities and integrated approach to handling clients’ financial matters. It also plans to expand client base in key emerging wealth markets, such as Middle East and Asia.

By the end of October, the group will have closed the sale of Barclays Life, its life insurance business. Sale of other non-core assets might be considered with a view to profit optimization.

In the update on capital, dividend and current trading (released on the 13th of October), Barclays’ assured that the bank is well capitalized and that in September its profits significantly exceeded the monthly run rate for the first half of the year. Given the higher capital targets set by FSA, Barclays will issue preference shares to raise £3bn by the end of the year and new ordinary shares to raise £0.6bn to make up for the acquisition of Lehman Brothers units. Issue of new ordinary shares to raise a further £3bn will happen after the announcement of 2008 results. Balance sheet management and operational efficiencies are expected to release a further £1.5bn in equity resources.

The need to maximize capital resources in the times of crisis led Barclays to decide that final dividend for 2008 will not be paid. It intends to resume dividend payments in the second half of 2009.

About these ads
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 46 other followers

%d bloggers like this: